This extends the collection with support for seamless authentication at the Jitsi server using Matrix OpenID.

1. New role for installing the [Matrix User Verification Service](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-user-verification-service)
2. Changes to Jitsi role: Installing Jitsi Prosody Mods and configuring Jitsi Auth
3. Changes to Jitsi and nginx-proxy roles: Serving .well-known/element/jitsi from jitsi.DOMAIN
4. We updated the Jitsi documentation on authentication and added documentation for the user verification service.

* Changes to allow a user to set the max participants on a jitsi
conference

* changed var name from jitsi_max_participants to matrix_prosody_jitsi_max_participants

* Add task to configure a standalone JVB on a different server

* add missing file

* set nginx config

* update prosody file and expose port 5222

* change variable name to server id

* formatting change

* use server id of jvb-1 for the main server

* adding documentation

* adding more jvbs

* rename variable

* revert file

* fix yaml error

* minor doc fixes

* renaming tags and introducing a common tag

* remove duplicates

* add mapping for jvb to hostname/ip

* missed a jvb_server

* Update roles/matrix-nginx-proxy/templates/nginx/conf.d/matrix-jitsi.conf.j2

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* PR review comments and additional documentation

* iterate on dict items

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* Update docs/configuring-playbook-jitsi.md

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

* adding documentation around the xmpp setting

* add common after

* reduce the number of services during init of the additional jvb

* remove rogue i

* revert change to jitsi init as it's needed

* only run the jvb service on the additional jvb host

* updating docs

* reset default and add documentation about the websocket port

* fix issue rather merge with master

* add missing role introduced in master

* this role is required too

* Adding new jitsi jvb playbook, moving setup.yml to matrix.yml and creating soft link

* updating documentation

* revert accidental change to file

* add symlink back to roles to aid running of the jitsi playbook

* Remove extra space

* Delete useless playbooks/roles symlink

* Remove blank lines

Co-authored-by: Slavi Pantaleev <slavi@devture.com>

This paves the way for installing other roles into `roles/galaxy` using `ansible-galaxy`,
similar to how it's done in:

- https://github.com/spantaleev/gitea-docker-ansible-deploy
- https://github.com/spantaleev/nextcloud-docker-ansible-deploy

In the near future, we'll be removing a lot of the shared role code from here
and using upstream roles for it. Some of the core `matrix-*` roles have
already been extracted out into other reusable roles:

- https://github.com/devture/com.devture.ansible.role.postgres
- https://github.com/devture/com.devture.ansible.role.systemd_docker_base
- https://github.com/devture/com.devture.ansible.role.timesync
- https://github.com/devture/com.devture.ansible.role.vars_preserver
- https://github.com/devture/com.devture.ansible.role.playbook_runtime_messages
- https://github.com/devture/com.devture.ansible.role.playbook_help

We just need to migrate to those.

matrix_jitsi_jicofo_component_secret var removed #1139

It's an optional service, so we shouldn't bother most people with it.

comments in config.js must begin with two slashes

This supersedes/fixes-up this Pull Request:
https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/pull/719

The Jitsi Web and JVB containers now (in build 5142) always
start by bulding their own default configuration
(`config.js` and `sip-communicator.properties`, respectively).

The fact that we were generating these files ourselves was no longer of use,
because our configuration was thrown away in favor of the one created
by the containers on startup.

With this commit, we're completely redoing things. We no longer
generate these configuration files. We try to pass the proper
environment variables, so that Jitsi services can generate the
configuration files themselves.

Besides that, we try to use the "custom configuration" mechanism
provided by Jitsi Web and Jitsi JVB (`custom-config.js` and
`custom-sip-communicator.properties`, respectively), so that
we and our users can inject additional configuration.

Some configuration options we had are gone now. Others are no longer
controllable via variables and need to be injected using
the `_config_extension` variables that we provide.

The validation logic that is part of the role should take care
to inform people about how to upgrade (if they're using some custom
configuration, which needs special care now). Most users should not
have to do anything special though.

modified example for jitsi ldap authentication to show all available variables.

Fixes #586 (Github Issue)

improve readability

This matches the way the ports are written in prerequisites.md and is the format that UFW likes.

We do this for 2 reasons:

- so we can control things which are not controllable using environment
variables (for example `stunServers` in jitsi/web, since we don't wish
to use the hardcoded Google STUN servers if our own Coturn is enabled)

- so playbook variable changes will properly rebuild the configuration.
When using Jitsi environment variables, the configuration is only built
once (the first time) and never rebuilt again. This is not the
consistent with the rest of the playbook and with how Ansible operates.
We're not perfect at it (yet), because we still let the Jitsi containers
generate some files on their own, but we are closer and it should be
good enough for most things.

Related to #415 (Github Pull Request).